Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Date: 2010-07-02 16:36:10
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Jun 28, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> While I would personally prefer to have an operator for the slicing
>> opeeration, I'm not willing to spend time arguing about it.  So, +1 to
>> implement the subset operation as the function slice(), and defer having
>> an operator until later.
> Yeah, I think the consensus is to avoid picking an operator name at all.
> "slice()" is OK by me.

Will this be done for Beta 3?



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-07-02 16:38:56
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow copydir() to be interrupted.
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2010-07-02 16:30:47
Subject: Re: server authentication over Unix-domain sockets

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group