Re: PostgreSQL+ Beta bug?

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Bo?ena Potempa" <Bozena(dot)Potempa(at)otc(dot)pl>
Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL+ Beta bug?
Date: 2002-11-19 14:35:32
Message-ID: EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJGEHGJMAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bo?ena Potempa [mailto:Bozena(dot)Potempa(at)otc(dot)pl]
>
> Hiroshi,
>
> > >Which version of PostgreSQL server are you connecting ?
> >>
> >> 7.2.3.
> >
> >I can't your case in 7.2.3 but in 7.2.1 the result is
> > 0 0 0 not 0 1 0.
>
> It is more complicated then I thought.
> I have 2 test installations of PostgreSQL: one on Linux
> and the second one on Windows NT, both 7.2.3 version.
> The Linux installation works with 0 stored in varchar
> field (the test results are as described in my previous
> e-mail). The Windows installation does not support zeroes
> in strings!

Hmm the difference may come from (non-)multibyte mode.

> Now I am not sure which behaviour is correct (and planned
> by PostgreSQL developers).

As far as I see PostgreSQL couldn't handle non-null-terminated
strings correctly.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2002-11-19 14:50:22 Re: FATAL 1: Sorry, too many clients already
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-19 14:04:10 Re: Increase inactivity timeout