Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects

From: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects
Date: 2009-06-26 22:39:09
Message-ID: EC025E49CC0AB774A3205928@[] (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--On 26. Juni 2009 13:08:37 +0900 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:

>  * Is the named large object (including fully qualified one) worth?
>    It will enables us to specify a largeobject with human readable
>    identifier string.

I don't understand the notion of this. Does this mean you can create a LO 
with an identifier string, generated from (e.g.) your application?



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-06-26 23:25:13
Subject: Re: Join optimization for inheritance tables
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2009-06-26 21:20:23
Subject: Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group