Re: :PgSQL: More Queestions

From: David Wheeler <david(at)wheeler(dot)net>
To: Rudy Lippan <rlippan(at)remotelinux(dot)com>
Cc: Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, Jeff Urlwin <jurlwin(at)bellatlantic(dot)net>, <dbi-dev(at)perl(dot)org>, <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: :PgSQL: More Queestions
Date: 2002-11-21 03:03:42
Message-ID: D72CFCD8-FCFD-11D6-8943-0003931A964A@wheeler.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 08:17 AM, Rudy Lippan wrote:

> Postgres does, however ugly it may be. So this needs to be suported
> lest
> a \" thow off placeholder counting and thus breaking execute(). But
> at
> least pg supports geminate "s.

Um, sorry (revealing my ignorance again): What's 'geminate "s"'?

Thanks,

David

--
David Wheeler AIM: dwTheory
david(at)wheeler(dot)net ICQ: 15726394
http://david.wheeler.net/ Yahoo!: dew7e
Jabber: Theory(at)jabber(dot)org

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Wheeler 2002-11-21 03:09:34 Re: :PgSQL: More Queestions
Previous Message David Wheeler 2002-11-21 03:02:51 Re: DBD::PostgreSQL