Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Kuzmenkov <a(dot)kuzmenkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Date: 2018-04-06 18:08:37
Message-ID: CAPpHfdsORjuUoEbAi-maApOXsyQNrfy9SyZuzDbOMic3uT-CcQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:42 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Alexander Korotkov
> <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> > Thinking about that again, I found that we should relax our requirements
> to
> > "minus infinity" items, because pg_upgraded indexes doesn't have any
> > special bits set for those items.
> >
> > What do you think about applying following patch on the top of v14?
>
> It's clearly necessary. Looks fine to me.
>

OK, incorporated into v15. I've also added sentence about pg_upgrade
to the commit message.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Covering-v15.patch application/octet-stream 206.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-04-06 18:13:42 Re: Online enabling of checksums
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2018-04-06 17:59:17 Re: Online enabling of checksums