Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Keep one postmaster monitoring pipe per process

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Keep one postmaster monitoring pipe per process
Date: 2018-09-06 11:17:02
Message-ID: CAM103DtMiG7sd4SxSOAioWmedH5GYNy4dwsO-rNqKqi=NtQnkA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ugrrr! PLEASE ignore this! It's not wrong at all.

2018年9月6日(木) 18:58 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>:

> - The following assertion looks contradicting to the comment.
> | /* Postmaster-managed callers must handle postmaster death somehow. */
> | Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster ||
> | (wakeEvents & (WL_EXIT_ON_PM_DEATH)) != 0 ||
> | (wakeEvents & (WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH)) != 0);
>

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Travers 2018-09-06 11:31:43 Re: Funny hang on PostgreSQL 10 during parallel index scan on slave
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2018-09-06 10:55:39 Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots