Re: Role Attribute Bitmask Catalog Representation

From: Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Role Attribute Bitmask Catalog Representation
Date: 2014-12-23 14:55:18
Message-ID: CAKRt6CR-JJ775cW9ShVOhqMfmrpD=oAErTwarPgXTbLg3vM8dw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvarao,

> Pushed with a couple of small changes (Catalog.pm complained about the
> lack of a CATALOG() line in the new acldefs.h file; you had
> pg_role_all_attributes as returning "bool" in the table, but it returns
> text[]; and I added index entries for the new functions.)

That's fantastic! Thanks, I appreciate it!

-Adam

--
Adam Brightwell - adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com
Database Engineer - www.crunchydatasolutions.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-12-23 15:18:02 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use a bitmask to represent role attributes
Previous Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2014-12-23 14:54:01 Re: Proposal "VACUUM SCHEMA"