Re: heap_sync seems rather oblivious to partitioned tables (wal_level=minimal)

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: heap_sync seems rather oblivious to partitioned tables (wal_level=minimal)
Date: 2018-10-01 02:33:51
Message-ID: CAKJS1f9rgKpp_ic-8UPnsDyVD-AquHVzwGO12-oN_Mj51w-Hqg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 28 September 2018 at 19:22, David Rowley
<david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I've edited that in the attached patch. Also reworded a comment that
> Amit mentioned and made a small change to the COPY FREEZE docs to
> mention no support for partitioned tables.

Added to the November 'fest.

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/20/1811/

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-01 02:34:03 Re: pgbench - test whether a variable exists
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-01 02:31:01 Re: pgbench exit code