Re: parse_subscription_options - suggested improvements

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parse_subscription_options - suggested improvements
Date: 2021-12-08 04:09:02
Message-ID: CAHut+PvSkLSh8xXk-Gjw3aLHK84c48=JR0_8S5V5b=nN54+TxA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 2:51 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 08:12:59AM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 6:07 AM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Attached a v14 with the initializations added back.
> >
> > LGTM.
>
> All the code paths previously covered still are, so applied this one.
> Thanks!

Thanks for pushing!

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-12-08 04:19:02 Re: Is it correct to update db state in control file as "shutting down" during end-of-recovery checkpoint?
Previous Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-12-08 03:51:48 Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<<postmaster_pid>>)?