Re: Exclude pg_largeobject form pg_dump

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Exclude pg_largeobject form pg_dump
Date: 2016-11-29 21:31:49
Message-ID: CAECtzeUiB5_PK5pZXOzmY+4aCZmH6Kdsa=n2LkPg52p6CuW=+g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

2016-11-29 17:12 GMT+01:00 Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>:

> Guillaume, Amul,
>
> * Amul Sul (sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> > make installcheck-world: tested, passed
> > Implements feature: tested, passed
> > Spec compliant: not tested
> > Documentation: tested, passed
> >
> > Patch v6 looks good to me, passing to committer.
> >
> > Thanks !
> >
> > The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer
>
> I've pushed this patch. In the future if you are working with the
> pg_dump TAP tests and add a new 'run', be sure to update the 'tests' to
> indicate which tests should 'like' or 'unlike' that run. If you have
> any questions, feel free to ask.
>
>
Thank you. And thanks Amul for the review.

--
Guillaume.
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sinclair, Ian D (Ian) 2016-11-29 22:20:11 How to migrate from PGSQL 9.3 to 9.6
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2016-11-29 19:18:07 Re: Backup "Best Practices"

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2016-11-29 21:36:18 Re: patch: function xmltable
Previous Message Corey Huinker 2016-11-29 20:37:59 Re: PSQL commands: \quit_if, \quit_unless