Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query
Date: 2018-10-10 21:14:54
Message-ID: CACjxUsN+OJexxdBp5U-nfh7cF7iaHCng-odEhp6DE=uNgYRacQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 9:40 PM Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Rebased.

It applies and builds clean, it passed make world with cassert and TAP
tests, and I can't see any remaining flaws. This is true both of just
the 0001 v16 patch and that with 0002 v16 applied on top of it.

It would be great if someone with a big test machine could stress test
and benchmark this versus current production versions.

--
Kevin Grittner
VMware vCenter Server
https://www.vmware.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-10-10 21:22:56 Re: BUG #15425: DETACH/ATTACH PARTITION bug
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-10-10 21:09:23 Re: automatic restore point