Re: pg_upgrade documentation improvement patch

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Yuri Niyazov <yuri(at)academia(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade documentation improvement patch
Date: 2016-10-03 01:36:30
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSE7_GxOmn0g=w5-Ue+rwS0NAkUMtjZBay9jxf9TewmXg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:42 AM, Yuri Niyazov <yuri(at)academia(dot)edu> wrote:
> Should I update the documentation patch to instruct the use of
> pg_controldata exclusively?

I guess so. Marked as returned with feedback because the thread has died.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-10-03 01:42:39 Re: GiST support for UUIDs
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-10-03 01:24:13 Re: "Re: Question about grant create on database and pg_dump/pg_dumpall