Re: Fun fact about autovacuum and orphan temp tables

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fun fact about autovacuum and orphan temp tables
Date: 2016-11-21 21:15:29
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRxuAkyAdxQL9HkFrcNq3RqXJJXAW0bzDsdQPsMr-dg2A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't think that you should skip it in the wraparound case, because
> it might be one of the temp tables that is threatening wraparound.
>
> I've committed the patch after doing some work on the comments.

OK, thanks.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2016-11-21 21:58:15 Re: postgres 9.3 postgres_fdw ::LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer
Previous Message Alexander Law 2016-11-21 21:05:21 Re: [HACKERS] switching documentation build to XSLT