Re: Allowing SSL connection of v11 client to v10 server with SCRAM channel binding

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Allowing SSL connection of v11 client to v10 server with SCRAM channel binding
Date: 2017-12-08 22:45:28
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRd4wJ=5i==0aAtHMrD6x5B7LKfGCFpyaNjmKfnsCee1Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 12/1/17 18:11, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Cool. Thanks. For REL_10_STABLE, I would suggest the attached patch
>> then. This ensures that eSws is checked in the final message and that
>> the cbind-flag sent in the first message maps with the data of the
>> final message in the backend. I have checked with the following
>> configurations with a v10 backend:
>> - v11 libpq with SSL
>> - v11 libpq without SSL
>> - v10 libpq with SSL
>> - v10 libpq without SSL
>> And in all cases the connection is accepted as it should.
>
> Committed.

Thanks.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message legrand legrand 2017-12-08 22:55:53 Re: Partition-wise aggregation/grouping
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2017-12-08 22:42:13 Re: CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY