Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support
Date: 2015-11-04 06:09:31
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQ5M=h=UAOiS3Nw4==hJAioZoYzZgX1fHNcMqOGsMnFDQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> That's still strange to have a dummy object in
>> postgres_fdw.so just for testing purposes.
>
> We could drop the extra functions at the end of the test, but I don't
> see the point exactly. We'd just be leaving the regression test database
> with some odd contents of the extension --- there's not any wider effect
> than that.

Oh, I see. Then we rely just on the fact that postgres_fdw is
installed. Are you working on a patch? Do you need one?
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message breen 2015-11-04 06:23:15 BUG #13755: pgwin32_is_service not checking if SECURITY_SERVICE_SID is disabled
Previous Message Catalin Iacob 2015-11-04 06:06:34 Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport