Re: assessing parallel-safety

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: assessing parallel-safety
Date: 2015-09-03 10:05:55
Message-ID: CAA4eK1Kd2SunKX=e5sSFSrFfc++_uHnt5_HyKd+XykFjDWZseQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
>
> I went ahead and completed this patch with respect to adding new clause
> in CREATE/ALTER FUNCTION which can allow users to define the
> parallel property for User defined functions.
>

Attached, find the rebased patch which can be used to review/test latest
version of parallel_seqscan patch which I am going to post in the parallel
seq. scan thread soonish.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
assess-parallel-safety-v8.tar application/x-tar 92.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-09-03 10:17:43 Re: WIP: Make timestamptz_out less slow.
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2015-09-03 09:36:02 Re: pgbench stats per script & other stuff