Re: SQL key word list and SQL:2011

On 19 May 2012 14:00, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:

> What I'd suggest is that we keep only the SQL:2011 column.  The
> differences from 2003 to 2011 aren't that great that it's very useful to
> analyze  the differences, and 1999 and 1992 are really only of
> archeological interest.

The SQL:2011 standard replaces previous standards, so I agree: we
should only list the current version of the standard. The previous
versions of the standard are simply no longer relevant.

If people want that, we could have a little text at bottom saying
Changes between 2008 and 2011 etc.. if that really is interesting -
and if it really is then it should be listed as incompatibilities in
the release notes.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services