Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_stats_recovery view

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stats_recovery view
Date: 2012-03-15 22:17:04
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>> I haven't looked through the code in detail, but one direct comment:
>>> do we really need/want to send this through the stats collector? It
>>> will only ever have one sender - perhaps we should just either store
>>> it in shared memory or store it locally and only send it on demand?
>> fyi, i intend to send a reworked patch later today, it will store the
>> info locally and send it on demand.
> Jaime,
> are you planning to submit the updated version of the patch?

Hearing no response, I have marked this patch Returned with Feedback.

Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-03-15 22:18:18
Subject: Re: logging in high performance systems.
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2012-03-15 22:14:12
Subject: Re: Faster compression, again

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group