Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: WIP -- renaming implicit sequences

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <munro(at)ip9(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP -- renaming implicit sequences
Date: 2012-01-19 23:53:42
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue ene 19 18:07:33 -0300 2012:
>> I think we should remove this from the TODO list, or at least document
>> that there are a number of reasons why it might be a deeper hole than
>> it appears to be at first glance.
> Maybe not remove it, but instead add a link to this discussion.

I don't see what that accomplishes, unless someone's arguing that we
really do want this behavior...?

Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2012-01-20 00:15:15
Subject: Re: WIP -- renaming implicit sequences
Previous:From: Erik RijkersDate: 2012-01-19 23:33:55
Subject: Re: WIP: index support for regexp search

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group