Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: leakproof

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, marc(at)bloodnok(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Subject: Re: leakproof
Date: 2012-02-23 00:41:37
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> On 02/22/2012 04:29 PM, Marc Munro wrote:
>>> As the developer of veil I feel marginally qualified to bikeshed here:
>>> how about "silent"?  A silent function being one that will not blab.
>> I also made this suggestion later in the day.
> SILENT isn't a bad idea.  It seems to lead the mind in the right
> direction, or at least not encourage people to guess the wrong meaning.


OK, OK, I'm joking...

Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-02-23 00:48:50
Subject: Re: [PATCH] typo fix
Previous:From: Affan SalmanDate: 2012-02-23 00:26:43
Subject: Commit a445cb92 not tested without OpenSSL support?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group