Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers

From: Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers
Date: 2011-01-26 21:39:51
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-rrreviewers
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> It's just that
> I require both income and sleep.  That's probably not an issue for
> people who are just getting started in the community.
> Another question is whether you really need assigned mentors at all.

Very few emails on -hackers go unanswered.

So I take it that the concern is not how reviews are funded, but over the
perceived connection between the organic community and third party
organizations.   This makes sense.

So any person regardless of association or funding is free to approach to
community for assistance.  In addition, third party organizations should
maintain a healthy disconnection from the community.

Is this correct?

Richard Broersma Jr.

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-26 21:41:42
Subject: Re: new compiler warnings
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2011-01-26 21:38:31
Subject: Re: .gitignore patch for coverage builds

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2011-01-26 21:50:21
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-26 21:19:15
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group