Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Date: 2010-07-02 17:07:21
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:36 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> While I would personally prefer to have an operator for the slicing
>>> opeeration, I'm not willing to spend time arguing about it.  So, +1 to
>>> implement the subset operation as the function slice(), and defer having
>>> an operator until later.
>> Yeah, I think the consensus is to avoid picking an operator name at all.
>> "slice()" is OK by me.
> Will this be done for Beta 3?

You forgot to attach the patch.  :-)

Robert Haas
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2010-07-02 18:39:23
Subject: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2010-07-02 16:39:18
Subject: Re: server authentication over Unix-domain sockets

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group