Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Interpretability with xDBC specification

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Sumit Pandya <sumit(dot)pandya(at)elitecore(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Interpretability with xDBC specification
Date: 2010-07-06 10:44:42
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Hi Sumit,

You would do well to read the list archives specifically for this
topic. There have been many posts of late.


On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Sumit Pandya <sumit(dot)pandya(at)elitecore(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>        In this mail chain I propose to make a seamless migration path
> towards PostgreSQL. There are people who like to migrate from other database
> to PostgreSQL. However first problem in that comes is related to feature
> compliance and code-changes for same.
>        Remember that code-change remains as a big hindrance for any
> programmer/company.
>        To start with I'd like to propose compliance for JDBC and ODBC
> drivers. Reason for JDBC/ODBC selection is with the facts that
>        1> Specifications for both are into proper place,
>        2> Mostly application programmers communicate with this method
>        There are some specification; example setQueryTimeout of JDBC; which
> PostgreSQL doesnot complies.
>        Non compliance could be fine at some extent. But here problem is
> when a code which is written for database supporting setQueryTimeout and
> when we planned to test PostgreSQL we got exception from driver.
>        To move further require to comment out all that code and then
> progress further.
>        Now I propose to not throwing any exception there. It is better if
> PostgreSQL - JDBC/ODBC doesnot honor this method. It is painful to change
> product source-code for this limitation.
>        I donot have idea on debug facility in PostgreSQL - JDBC/ODBC. If
> you have some debug-log framework available then such non-implemented call
> could be part of high level debugging messages.
>        Please share your opinion/comments.
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:

In response to


pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Sumit PandyaDate: 2010-07-06 11:30:04
Subject: Re: Interpretability with xDBC specification
Previous:From: Sumit PandyaDate: 2010-07-05 10:59:20
Subject: Interpretability with xDBC specification

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group