On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> On 09/27/2010 10:39 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
> On 09/27/2010 10:11 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> What should be the value of 'Message-ID for original patch' ?
> the URL:
> or the ID: AANLkTinw0HL+jQmrtwXC9Y2tqhcfHFgFekxyyfYGvQrB(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com
> The latter.
> Could this perhaps be made clearer on the page, perhaps with an example? It
> confused me recently too.
> Can you suggest something more specific?
> Well, it could say something like:
> The Message-ID can be found in the headers of the relevant email to the
> pgsql-hackers mailing list, and also in the mailing list archives at
> http://archives.postgresql.org. It looks something like this (the format
> varies somewhat depending on the sender's Mail User Agent):
> That would certainly have given me, and I suspect Gurjeet, enough clue.
Where on the page would you suggest that we put that text?
The Enterprise Postgres Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Llewellyn, Mark (ADP DSI)||Date: 2010-09-27 15:27:03|
|Subject: Re: BUG #5650: Postgres service showing as stopped when in
fact it is running|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-09-27 15:15:58|
|Subject: Re: Improving prep_buildtree used in VPATH builds|