From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries |
Date: | 2011-02-01 00:48:13 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTik8yiz+85dii0v6ErZgjw8V7DfmXnL2Uj=vKcGj@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 1 February 2011 00:41, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> On 1 February 2011 00:36, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> writes:
>>> Actually, those lower bound errors aren't related to generate_series,
>>> but I'd still like to know why -2147483648::int4 is out of range.
>>
>> :: binds tighter than - (and everything else too). Write
>> (-2147483648)::int4 instead.
>
> D'oh. You explained this to me before. This time I'll endeavour to
> remember it. At least that explains the problem I created for myself
> with lower boundaries.
Okay, so lower boundaries are still affected in the same way as upper
boundaries after all, at least when using a reverse series:
SELECT x FROM generate_series((-2147483644)::int4,
(-2147483648)::int4, -1) AS a(x);
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Aleksey Tsalolikhin | 2011-02-01 00:54:38 | Why does my DB size differ between Production and DR? (Postgres 8.4) |
Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2011-02-01 00:41:25 | Re: Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-02-01 01:05:25 | Re: Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries |
Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2011-02-01 00:41:25 | Re: Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries |