Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: We need to log aborted autovacuums

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: We need to log aborted autovacuums
Date: 2011-01-17 01:50:49
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I agree with you, but if we want it *this* release, on top of all the
> other features we have queued, then I suggest we compromise. If you hold
> out for more feature, you may get less.
> Statement timeout = 2 * (100ms + autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay) *
> tablesize/(autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit / vacuum_cost_page_dirty)

I'm inclined to think that would be a very dangerous compromise.

Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-17 01:52:43
Subject: Re: psql: Add \dL to show languages
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-17 01:49:32
Subject: Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group