Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Win32 regression test status

From: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
To: 'Tom Lane ' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,'Bruce Momjian ' <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>,"''pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org' '" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 regression test status
Date: 2004-03-09 01:08:34
Message-ID: A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F365@harris.memetrics.local (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
Hi guys, 

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Agreed, we don't add them to all joins, but don't we historically add
> > ORDER BY to queries that are shown to be sensitive to qsort
> > implementations on various platforms?  Are you suggesting we create a
> > separate regression output file for that platform?
> I'm not suggesting any particular solution yet, just pointing out that
> there are reasons to look for alternatives rather than automatically
> adding ORDER BY.

Doesn't seem to be a consensus here, so:

Tom, I'm happy at looking at whatever alternatives you can suggest.

Bruce, failing the above, I'm happy to check + provide the required ORDER BY


Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see 


pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-03-10 22:56:07
Subject: fsync with sync, and Win32 unlink
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-08 19:26:55
Subject: Re: Win32 regression test status

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group