Re: Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Ivan Kartyshov <i(dot)kartyshov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed
Date: 2018-03-13 13:06:24
Message-ID: 9bddca2a-15f5-a29b-1462-f06a8b2a3498@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Ivan,

On 3/6/18 9:25 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 02:24:24PM +0300, Ivan Kartyshov wrote:
>> Hello, I now is preparing the patch over syntax that Simon offered. And in
>> few day I will update the patch.
>> Thank you for your interest in thread.
>
> It has been more than one month since a patch update has been requested,
> and time is growing short. This refactored patch introduces a whole new
> concept as well, so my recommendation would be to mark this patch as
> returned with feedback, and then review it freshly for v12 if this
> concept is still alive and around.

This patch wasn't updated at the beginning of the CF and still hasn't
been updated after almost two weeks.

I have marked the patch Returned with Feedback. Please resubmit to a
new CF when you have an updated patch.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2018-03-13 13:08:01 Re: SQL/JSON: functions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-03-13 12:48:56 Re: Using base backup exclusion filters to reduce data transferred with pg_rewind