From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Ivan Kartyshov <i(dot)kartyshov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed |
Date: | 2018-03-13 13:06:24 |
Message-ID: | 9bddca2a-15f5-a29b-1462-f06a8b2a3498@pgmasters.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Ivan,
On 3/6/18 9:25 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 02:24:24PM +0300, Ivan Kartyshov wrote:
>> Hello, I now is preparing the patch over syntax that Simon offered. And in
>> few day I will update the patch.
>> Thank you for your interest in thread.
>
> It has been more than one month since a patch update has been requested,
> and time is growing short. This refactored patch introduces a whole new
> concept as well, so my recommendation would be to mark this patch as
> returned with feedback, and then review it freshly for v12 if this
> concept is still alive and around.
This patch wasn't updated at the beginning of the CF and still hasn't
been updated after almost two weeks.
I have marked the patch Returned with Feedback. Please resubmit to a
new CF when you have an updated patch.
Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2018-03-13 13:08:01 | Re: SQL/JSON: functions |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-03-13 12:48:56 | Re: Using base backup exclusion filters to reduce data transferred with pg_rewind |