Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms
Date: 2009-07-24 21:41:18
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Stephen Frost<sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Peter,
> * Peter Eisentraut (peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net) wrote:
>> After closer inspection, not having a win64 box available, I have my doubts
>> whether this patch actually does anything.  Foremost, it doesn't touch the
>> definition of the Datum type, which ought to be at the core of a change like
>> this.
> Do you need access to a Win64 box?  I can provide you access to a
> Win64 system, which Dave Page and Magnus already have access to, if it
> would be useful..

I haven't got round to installing a build env on there yet btw.

Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Reini UrbanDate: 2009-07-24 21:47:03
Subject: Enable SSPI on cygwin
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2009-07-24 21:35:50
Subject: Re: explain refactoring v4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group