Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Start background writer during archive recovery.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Start background writer during archive recovery.
Date: 2009-02-19 16:22:53
Message-ID: 8929.1235060573@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Maybe the postmaster should wait for startup process exit before
>> deciding to open for business, instead of just a signal.

> Not a bad idea. Although, there's nothing wrong with the current way
> either. The startup process does a proc_exit(0) right after sending the
> signal ATM, so there's no real work left at that point.

The thing wrong with it is assuming that nothing interesting will happen
during proc_exit(). We hang enough stuff on on_proc_exit hooks that
that seems like a pretty shaky assumption.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-02-19 16:43:13 pgsql: Fix bogus comment, from the patch to start bgwriter during
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-02-19 16:20:22 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Start background writer during archive recovery.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-02-19 16:25:50 Re: autovacuum not honoring pg_autovacuum in 8.3.5?
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-02-19 16:20:22 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Start background writer during archive recovery.