Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I fail to see how rejecting unreviewed patches provides benefit for
> users, developers or sponsors.
Nobody has suggested rejecting either sync replication or standby database.
The debate here is over whether to commit into 8.4 or into 8.5.
Put another way, the choice here is whether to have a half-baked delayed 8.4
release in 6 months or a polished on-time 8.5 release in 12 months. Either way
the feature ships and on a not terribly different timeline either.
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostGIS support!
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Albe Laurenz||Date: 2009-01-26 15:40:12|
|Subject: Re: problem with archive_command as suggested by documentation|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2009-01-26 15:30:48|
|Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql:Automatic view update rules)|