RE: RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "'pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects
Date: 2000-10-25 08:28:33
Message-ID: 8568FC767B4AD311AC33006097BCD3D61A26D4@woody.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Mount [mailto:petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk]
> Sent: 24 October 2000 12:43
> To: 'Tom Lane'; Peter Mount
> Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org; pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for
> large objects
>
>
> Yes, the joins were one of the reasons I was going to do it.
>
> If no one starts a list by Saturday, then I'll start one when
> I go through
> JDBC.
>
> Peter

I have done some work like this for the next release of pgAdmin (mainly
views to allow easy reporting on db objects) - if you want copies of what I
have let me know, it might be a starting point.

Dave.

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message stuart hodgkinson 2000-10-25 08:54:35 ODBC info & help!
Previous Message Ken Kachnowich 2000-10-24 23:09:45 Re: RE: datetime fix