Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Numeric version of factorial()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>,PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Numeric version of factorial()
Date: 2003-12-02 00:27:36
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I had to remove the factorial example from the casting docs because
> factorial is now defined only for numeric.  Would someone take the
> attached example and make a new one with a different operator?  


			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: cnliouDate: 2003-12-02 16:24:03
Subject: Inserting timestamp values
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-12-01 21:54:28
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Numeric version of factorial()

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-12-02 00:32:26
Subject: Re: 7.4 shared memory error on 64-bit SPARC/Solaris 5.8
Previous:From: Sean ChittendenDate: 2003-12-02 00:15:39
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group