Possible substitute for PostmasterIsAlive polling loops

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Possible substitute for PostmasterIsAlive polling loops
Date: 2011-02-23 21:54:20
Message-ID: 7701.1298498060@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

We've touched a few times on trying to get rid of the
sleep-awhile-and-check-for-something-to-do loops in PG's auxiliary
processes, mainly to satisfy people who complain about CPU power
consumption when idle. I can see how most of the something-to-do
checks can be reimplemented using latches, but up to now there
didn't seem to be a good way to get rid of waking up every so often
to check if the postmaster was still there. So it got my attention
when someone mentioned this Linux syscall on a Red Hat mailing list:

NAME
prctl - operations on a process

SYNOPSIS
#include <sys/prctl.h>

int prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3,
unsigned long arg4, unsigned long arg5);

...
The first argument can be:
...

PR_SET_PDEATHSIG (since Linux 2.1.57)
Set the parent process death signal of the calling process to
arg2 (either a signal value in the range 1..maxsig, or 0 to
clear). This is the signal that the calling process will get
when its parent dies. This value is cleared for the child of a
fork(2).

IOW, at least on Linux, you *can* arrange to get a signal when your
parent process dies.

Not sure how ugly it'd be to use this call when available and a time
delay when not, but it's something to think about.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-02-23 22:37:39 Re: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-02-23 21:30:04 Re: Binary in/out for aclitem