Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: david_list(at)boreham(dot)org, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Date: 2007-01-02 18:55:28
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Also, do we really want to import the NSPR into Postgres? I suspect not. 
> Of course, the only thing that people are tripping over license-wise is 
> libpq. But I think we would want to keep that as lean and mean as 
> possible, too.

Yeah, requiring NSPR to be imported into all client applications that
use libpq is an utter non-starter :-(

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-01-02 19:00:27
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] xlog directory at initdb time
Previous:From: David BorehamDate: 2007-01-02 18:48:42
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group