Re: [HACKERS] SPI Headers -- RPM distribution

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SPI Headers -- RPM distribution
Date: 1999-12-21 15:47:16
Message-ID: 7263.945791236@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> Also, I have noticed that some headers are #included with <>, while
> others are included with "". Now, I understand that system headers
> should be included with <>, but I'm seeing PostgreSQL headers wrapped
> with <>. This makes the cpp -M variants a little confusing -- while
> tracing down the header dependencies, I started using cpp -MM, which
> only follows user headers and not system headers -- but it doesn't get
> all of the headers.

Bruce has done a nice job of cleaning that up in current sources, but
yes, 6.5.* and older releases were mighty inconsistent about header
inclusions.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 1999-12-21 16:16:27 Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on (pgindent)
Previous Message Lamar Owen 1999-12-21 15:40:18 Re: [HACKERS] SPI Headers -- RPM distribution

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 1999-12-21 16:44:45 Re: [ANNOUNCE] Announce: PostgreSQL-6.5.3 binaries available for Windows NT
Previous Message Lamar Owen 1999-12-21 15:40:18 Re: [HACKERS] SPI Headers -- RPM distribution