Re: [WIP] CREATE SUBSCRIPTION with FOR TABLES clause (table filter)

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Evgeniy Efimkin <efimkin(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Дмитрий Сарафанников <dsarafan(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Владимир Бородин <root(at)simply(dot)name>
Subject: Re: [WIP] CREATE SUBSCRIPTION with FOR TABLES clause (table filter)
Date: 2019-02-17 10:33:12
Message-ID: 67FE003B-14DA-4F06-8E45-F58FE8D54CD7@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi!

> 14 февр. 2019 г., в 20:04, Evgeniy Efimkin <efimkin(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> написал(а):
>
> <subscription_v4.patch>

I've made some more iterations looking for ideas how to improve the patch and found non.
Code style, docs, tests, make-check worlds, bit status, everything seems OK. A little bit of copied code from dblink (there is no problem like CVE-2018-10915, or is it?) and copied tests.
I'm inclined to mark the patch as RFC if there is no objections.

May be we could also ask some input from cloud managed PostgreSQL providers, what they think about this patch? This patch, actually, is aimed at easing moving to the cloud DB where user has no superuser privileges.

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2019-02-17 12:11:23 Re: Actual Cost
Previous Message Andrey Borodin 2019-02-17 08:55:05 Re: amcheck verification for GiST