Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs

From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date: 2019-02-17 02:52:52
Message-ID: 62080f95-3934-4700-00ca-7c35630ab7a0@proxel.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 16/02/2019 22.14, Tom Lane wrote:
> I was expecting more controversy ... pushed that way.

Thanks! And thanks to everyone else who worked on this patch!

Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Donald Dong 2019-02-17 03:32:59 Re: Actual Cost
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-02-17 02:44:25 Re: Actual Cost