Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: explain and PARAM_EXEC

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: explain and PARAM_EXEC
Date: 2010-02-20 13:11:59
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> It's really not much different from a function call with subplans as
>> functions.
> Perhaps it would be clearer to display the "(Subplan 1)" in a function
> call style format like Subplan1(b.oid)

I thought about that, too...  maybe for 9.1 we should consider it.  It
might be nice to add some sort of glyph to make the user less likely
to think that Subplan1 is in fact a function. <Subplan1>(b.oid)?
${Subplan1}(b.oid)?  I dunno.


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dimitri FontaineDate: 2010-02-20 13:31:01
Subject: parallelizing subplan execution (was: explain and PARAM_EXEC)
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-02-20 13:10:03
Subject: Re: explain and PARAM_EXEC

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group