From: | "Zubkovsky, Sergey" <Sergey(dot)Zubkovsky(at)transas(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT |
Date: | 2008-03-14 16:33:37 |
Message-ID: | 528853D3C5ED2C4AA8990B504BA7FB850106DF14@sol.transas.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
The previous results were received on PG 8.3 version:
"PostgreSQL 8.3.0, compiled by Visual C++ build 1400"
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 7:19 PM
To: Zubkovsky, Sergey
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT
[ moved to -hackers --- see original thread here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2008-03/msg00039.php
]
"Zubkovsky, Sergey" <Sergey(dot)Zubkovsky(at)transas(dot)com> writes:
> Here is my example.
Hmm ... on my Fedora machine I get the same result (704512) in
all these cases, which is what I'd expect. (The exact value
could vary across platforms, of course.)
You said you were using the MinGW build --- maybe MinGW's version
of stat(2) isn't trustworthy?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2008-03-14 16:47:39 | Small typo in install-win32.sgml |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-14 16:19:20 | Re: pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-14 16:39:10 | Re: PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND doesn't work expectedly |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-14 16:19:20 | Re: pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT |