So does that mean there is no way to hide the source for procedural
language functions in postgresql?
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:mailing_lists(at)pandapocket(dot)com]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:34 PM
To: Wright, George
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] function source
I think that we have some functions that are defined in C. I'd have to
check the repository to get the source.
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 10:47 -0500, Wright, George wrote:
> Is there a way to hide/encrypt the source for functions I might write
> in any of the procedural languages?
> Doing \df+ <func> shows all of it.
In response to
pgsql-novice by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-07-11 14:10:16|
|Subject: Re: Dataimport from remote db |
|Previous:||From: Schoenit, Tobias AT/BHL-ZTPS||Date: 2008-07-11 11:34:04|
|Subject: Dataimport from remote db|