Re: pg_upgrade regression test litters the source tree with log files

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade regression test litters the source tree with log files
Date: 2013-01-08 21:11:41
Message-ID: 50EC8B8D.3020804@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/8/13 4:04 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 01:08:44PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In a tree in which I previously ran "make check" in contrib/pg_upgrade:
>>
>> $ make -s distclean
>> $ git status
>> # On branch master
>> # Untracked files:
>> # (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
>> #
>> # contrib/pg_upgrade/pg_upgrade_dump_1.log
>> # contrib/pg_upgrade/pg_upgrade_dump_12912.log
>> # contrib/pg_upgrade/pg_upgrade_dump_16384.log
>> nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
>>
>> Not sure how long this has been happening.
>
> Those look like files left over from a failed upgrade, or you used
> --retain. Does that make sense? Because they are tracked by oid, it
> is possible a later successful upgrade would not remove all those files,
> bit it should remove contrib/pg_upgrade/pg_upgrade_dump_1.log because it
> is "1".

I think this came in with the pg_upgrade --jobs option.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-01-08 21:12:15 Re: pg_upgrade regression test litters the source tree with log files
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-01-08 21:09:00 Re: [PATCH 2/5] Make relpathbackend return a statically result instead of palloc()'ing it