Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Paul Tillotson <pntil(at)shentel(dot)net>
Cc: "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-05 02:06:12
Message-ID: 5017.1112666772@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Paul Tillotson <pntil(at)shentel(dot)net> writes:
> Thus, even though I know very little about Ruby or TCL, I would gladly
> learn one of those if I knew that plruby or pltcl did all the stuff that
> a pl should (wasn't missing functionality such as writing triggers,
> set-returning functions), was efficiently implemented, was well tested,
> and was installed by default.

Well, *none* of the PLs except plpgsql are ever going to be built or
installed "by default", because we won't make the default build
configuration depend on packages that are likely not to be present.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2005-04-05 02:46:18 Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Previous Message Paul Tillotson 2005-04-05 00:52:43 Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2005-04-05 02:15:04 Re: DELETE ... USING
Previous Message Neil Conway 2005-04-05 01:18:05 Re: DELETE ... USING