Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #5297: Add XATMI C API

From: Michael Musgrove <mmusgrov(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #5297: Add XATMI C API
Date: 2011-04-21 17:04:43
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On 04/21/2011 05:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Musgrove<mmusgrov(at)redhat(dot)com>  writes:
>> The response to this issue says it is "Not a bug". Would it be possible
>> for someone to provide an indication of how much effort is involved in
>> providing XA support in the C API library (libpq)?
> What do you consider to be "providing XA support"?  XA requires there to
> be a transaction manager somewhere, which is not something libpq can
> provide since it's dependent on the good graces of its host application.
> Maybe there would be some value in teaching libpq to interact with an
> external XA manager, but what exactly do you think is required?
> 			regards, tom lane

I am referring to the X/Open specification Distributed Transaction 
Processing: The XA Specification 
( If postgresql 
provides a conforming Resource Manager switch then we can include 
postgresql work along with interactions with other Resource Managers 
(Oracle, DB2) in the same transaction. For example the equivalent 
support in Oracle that I am asking for is documented at


In response to


pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2011-04-21 18:53:47
Subject: Re: BUG #5297: Add XATMI C API
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-04-21 16:43:44
Subject: Re: BUG #5297: Add XATMI C API

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group