On 2011-02-26 2:00 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've gone ahead and applied the code portion of the patch, with
> modifications as per discussion, and other editorialization.
Thanks a lot!
One thing bothers me though: what was the reason for requiring a
RETURNING clause for data-modifying statements in WITH?
> I'll wait on you to produce documentation updates before dealing
> with the docs, but I figured we might as well get some buildfarm
> cycles on it meanwhile.
Thanks, I'll send an improved version tomorrow.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-02-26 02:41:20|
|Subject: Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature |
|Previous:||From: Daniel Farina||Date: 2011-02-26 01:35:17|
|Subject: Re: disposition of remaining patches|