Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature
Date: 2011-02-26 02:19:41
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2011-02-26 2:00 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've gone ahead and applied the code portion of the patch, with
> modifications as per discussion, and other editorialization.

Thanks a lot!

One thing bothers me though: what was the reason for requiring a 
RETURNING clause for data-modifying statements in WITH?

> I'll wait on you to produce documentation updates before dealing
> with the docs, but I figured we might as well get some buildfarm
> cycles on it meanwhile.

Thanks, I'll send an improved version tomorrow.

Marko Tiikkaja

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-02-26 02:41:20
Subject: Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature
Previous:From: Daniel FarinaDate: 2011-02-26 01:35:17
Subject: Re: disposition of remaining patches

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group