Re: [PATCH] V3: Idle in transaction cancellation

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] V3: Idle in transaction cancellation
Date: 2010-11-29 22:38:48
Message-ID: 4CF3D7180200002500037F2D@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> Ok, I implemented that capability

I applied all three patches with minor offsets, and it builds, but
several regression tests fail. I backed out the patches in reverse
order and confirmed that while the regression tests pass without
any of these patches, they fail with just the first, the first and
the second, or all three patches.

If you're not seeing the same thing there, I'll be happy to provide
the details.

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-11-29 23:42:57 Re: [PATCH] V3: Idle in transaction cancellation
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-11-29 21:56:50 Re: improving foreign key locks