Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Is PostGreSql's Data storage mechanism "inferior"?

From: Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>
To: Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Swaminathan Saikumar <swami(at)giveexam(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Is PostGreSql's Data storage mechanism "inferior"?
Date: 2008-01-31 01:06:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
On Jan 30, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Richard Broersma Jr wrote:

> If you don't get too much feed back on this subject, just remember  
> that topics like this come up frequently to the point of list  
> member exhaustion.   You can find such discussions if you search  
> the list archive.

Too true.  There's only so many times people can be confronted with  
"Defend yourselves!" before they start ignoring it.  On the flip  
side, when you approach with "Tell me, what advantages does Postgres  
have to offer?" you'll find many people all too willing to step up  
with pride.

Erik Jones

DBA | Emma®
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)

Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style.
Visit us online at

In response to


pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Swaminathan SaikumarDate: 2008-01-31 01:12:27
Subject: Re: Is PostGreSql's Data storage mechanism "inferior"?
Previous:From: Dan LangilleDate: 2008-01-31 01:03:14
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Certification

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group