Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: non-overlapping, consecutive partitions

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
To: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: non-overlapping, consecutive partitions
Date: 2010-07-23 20:15:41
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 7/23/2010 11:04 PM, Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
> does anybody see a solution to this problem?
> what are the main showstoppers to make something like this work?

I think we should absolutely make this work when we have a good 
partitioning implementation.

That said, I don't think it's wise to put a lot of effort into making 
this work with our current partitioning method when the partitioning 
patches are just around the corner.  The developer time should be 
directed at those patches instead.

Marko Tiikkaja

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2010-07-23 20:18:56
Subject: Re: patch: to_string, to_array functions
Previous:From: Marko TiikkajaDate: 2010-07-23 20:09:26
Subject: Re: Rewrite, normal execution vs. EXPLAIN ANALYZE

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group