Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 11:29 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> How does the attached patch look like? It's probably similar to what you
>> had in mind.
> It looks like a second version of what I'm working on and about to
> publish. I'll take that as a compliment!
> My patch is attached here also, for discussion.
> The two patches look same in their main parts, though I have quite a few
> extra tweaks in there, which you can read about in comments.
Yeah. Yours seems a lot more complex with all those extra tweaks, I
would suggest to keep it simple. I did realize one bug in my patch: I
didn't handle xid wraparound correctly in the binary search, need to use
TransactionIdFollows instead of plan >.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2010-04-16 12:00:22|
|Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2010-04-16 10:52:27|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] trouble with to_char('L')|