Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)
Date: 2010-01-21 23:33:27
Message-ID: 4B588FE7020000250002E9B9@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> If you want an example of something I *do* have a process problem
> with, it's Kevin Grittner's attempts to get people to put a
> significant number of cycles into thinking about true
> serializability.
> Right now is not the time for that to be happening. I've been
> politely ignoring that thread, but ...

Not my motive, but if you think that'll be the effect of posting
milestone patches, I'll hold 'em back. Apologies if I caused a
disruption.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-01-21 23:36:31 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-21 23:26:46 Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)